didnt we have some type of antispam filter

Open discussions about anything! Let's keep it Rated R (or better)!
Brenstel

didnt we have some type of antispam filter

Post#1 » 15 Nov 2012, 19:52

to block these spam posts in the recruitment threads

Doubtbringer

Re: didnt we have some type of antispam filter

Post#2 » 16 Nov 2012, 12:50

Not sure who takes care of the website maintenance but making a captcha parse on signing up would deter every single automated spam bot.

120
Bellarionna
Guild Master
Guild Master
Posts: 13603

Re: didnt we have some type of antispam filter

Post#3 » 16 Nov 2012, 12:52

We did, I thought... I wonder if it got disabled...

Tigridia can you please investigate?
-------- Stormrage - Alliance
Bellarionna - 110
Fiachro - 100
Lytheriah - 100
Barlick - 100
Kunjal - 100
Lyzebel - 100
Euphus - 100
Veylla - 100
Anatou - 100
Shalla - 100
Maevissa - 100
Kazgru - 98
Zadey (90) / Annabark (92) - Retired
-------- Bleeding Hollow - Horde
Selyndia - 90
Onetunn - 87

Dotmatrics

Re: didnt we have some type of antispam filter

Post#4 » 16 Nov 2012, 12:56

But I has want to dating hawt gurlz.

120
Bellarionna
Guild Master
Guild Master
Posts: 13603

Re: didnt we have some type of antispam filter

Post#5 » 16 Nov 2012, 12:58

Its still enabled, I just checked...

We ask for the 8 letter name of the company that made World of Warcraft.... maybe we should step that up a bit in difficulty?
-------- Stormrage - Alliance
Bellarionna - 110
Fiachro - 100
Lytheriah - 100
Barlick - 100
Kunjal - 100
Lyzebel - 100
Euphus - 100
Veylla - 100
Anatou - 100
Shalla - 100
Maevissa - 100
Kazgru - 98
Zadey (90) / Annabark (92) - Retired
-------- Bleeding Hollow - Horde
Selyndia - 90
Onetunn - 87

120
Bellarionna
Guild Master
Guild Master
Posts: 13603

Re: didnt we have some type of antispam filter

Post#6 » 16 Nov 2012, 12:59

Also, Tigridia...

It seems Dillweed and I are banning the IP Addresses for spammers, and I've noticed the same few IP's over and over... how are they posting if their IP was banned the first time?
-------- Stormrage - Alliance
Bellarionna - 110
Fiachro - 100
Lytheriah - 100
Barlick - 100
Kunjal - 100
Lyzebel - 100
Euphus - 100
Veylla - 100
Anatou - 100
Shalla - 100
Maevissa - 100
Kazgru - 98
Zadey (90) / Annabark (92) - Retired
-------- Bleeding Hollow - Horde
Selyndia - 90
Onetunn - 87

Doubtbringer

Re: didnt we have some type of antispam filter

Post#7 » 16 Nov 2012, 13:03

Bellarionna wrote:Its still enabled, I just checked...

We ask for the 8 letter name of the company that made World of Warcraft.... maybe we should step that up a bit in difficulty?


Any chance in making a random 8 letter / number generated image so there would never be automated bots again. As if its just enter the producer of wow, a person could go to the site, get the successful "word" and then the bots would be programmed to enter "well everyone would know this answer."

110
Tigridia
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1051

Re: didnt we have some type of antispam filter

Post#8 » 17 Nov 2012, 02:59

Bellarionna wrote:We ask for the 8 letter name of the company that made World of Warcraft.... maybe we should step that up a bit in difficulty?


Difficulty doesn't matter, since it was a human that answered the question and passed it on to the bots. Simply changing the Q&A should be sufficient. He will likely give up once he realizes that he is wasting his time.

User avatar
Cremate
Visitor
Visitor
Posts: 2265

Re: didnt we have some type of antispam filter

Post#9 » 17 Nov 2012, 03:11

On the bright side.... I now have a 12 month supply of Cialis.
The Champ Is Here.

110
Tigridia
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1051

Re: didnt we have some type of antispam filter

Post#10 » 17 Nov 2012, 03:35

Bellarionna wrote:It seems Dillweed and I are banning the IP Addresses for spammers, and I've noticed the same few IP's over and over... how are they posting if their IP was banned the first time?


Move a post that was posted from a banned IP to the admin forum and I will have a look.

110
Tigridia
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1051

Re: didnt we have some type of antispam filter

Post#11 » 17 Nov 2012, 03:50

Doubtbringer wrote:Any chance in making a random 8 letter / number generated image so there would never be automated bots again. As if its just enter the producer of wow, a person could go to the site, get the successful "word" and then the bots would be programmed to enter "well everyone would know this answer."


Captchas are surprisingly ineffective. Many bots can easily read them. Sometimes they are even better at it than humans.

We switched from captcha to Q&A years ago and the amount of spam dropped significantly.

Doubtbringer

Re: didnt we have some type of antispam filter

Post#12 » 17 Nov 2012, 08:59

Tigridia wrote:Captchas are surprisingly ineffective. Many bots can easily read them. Sometimes they are even better at it than humans.

We switched from captcha to Q&A years ago and the amount of spam dropped significantly.

Well Damn. I went to college for IST and (yeah its been a few years since i've graduated) but captchas were the best known thing when I was in school.
Perhaps a question that someone would have to answer and then a captcha? (making it look to the human who would be trying it for the bots --> nearly impossible?)

Return to “Open Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests

cron